![]() 07/14/2015 at 11:52 • Filed to: Plymouth Prowler | ![]() | ![]() |
In what hell does this car deserve to be called a Muscle Car AND have a framed picture of it?
Oh. A Truck stop bathroom in Kentucky, makes sense...
![]() 07/14/2015 at 11:53 |
|
It is an excellent muscle car. For me to poop on.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 11:54 |
|
They put it in the bathroom. Makes sense lol
![]() 07/14/2015 at 11:57 |
|
The Prowler is sexy that’s why!
![]() 07/14/2015 at 11:57 |
|
It’s the fastest looking slow car ever!!!!!
![]() 07/14/2015 at 11:59 |
|
0-60 times and quarter mile times are right in the middle of 60’s era muscle cars, but it is not a muscle car. A muscle car was an everyday car with a big ass engine.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:05 |
|
So does a V6 Camry...
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:07 |
|
Don’t get the hate for these. I think it’s a brilliant looking car.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:07 |
|
Muscle Prowler?
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:13 |
|
It looks 85% great, and 15% wrong. V6 and auto transaxle are a disappointment, mostly.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:13 |
|
Imagine sitting as a fancy restaurant, surrounded by beautiful and glamorous people. Your waiter arrives and places an exquisitely crafted plate in front of you, a Filet and a Lobster tail. They look delicious, but upon your first bite you discover that instead of delicious beef, the Filet is made of dirt and old sneakers.
I imagine that is how it feels to mash the go-pedal for the first time in a Prowler.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:17 |
|
Take off the bumper bar and it looks great. 253HP in something that light (after 1999) seems like it would still be not-boring to drive, and the 5.9 second 0-60 is pretty decent for that era. Rear trans results in a miata-like 50/50 weight distribution, and I don’t see people complaining about the 3-seconds-slower-to-60 Miata. Then again, it isn’t harked as a muscle car.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:18 |
|
5.9 seconds isn’t that bad. Certainly not boring. With the rear mounted transaxle and 50/50 weight distribution I bet it’s a hoot in the corners, too.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:20 |
|
For the time it was great.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:21 |
|
Not really fair to judge a 16 year old car based on modern performance standards.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:27 |
|
My Dad has one :(
Whyyyyyy?
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:28 |
|
That’s what I’m saying though. Back in the day it was fine. We don’t hear to many people bringing up that a lot of sainted muscle cars could be destroyed by a Camry.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 12:29 |
|
Bumper bar off helps, but I don’t, can’t, care for the headlights. The chin isn’t *quite* there either. I don’t mind the idea of a rear transaxle, but when it’s from a contemporary Dodge commuter sedan with no manual option, I don’t know that any amount of tuning in the world could make it *feel* right. Having a non-raucous V6 is like a professional wrestling heel with a suit and tie gimmick - he can do the job just fine and brings something *like* class but offers less for the ladies (so to speak). It’s more about the journey than the destination - the Prowler’s 0-60 time and skidpad are like driving to the same beach as a “proper” muscle car throwback takes you to but going through Newark to get there.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 13:49 |
|
Bad engine. Really fucking bad transmission.
![]() 07/14/2015 at 15:06 |
|
The hate is strong in this topic.
Not very Jalop of any of you, especially for such an off-beat car. All the love for crappy econocans that do literally nothing special except for be old but none for something purpose-built to be weird with tons of potential to make friggin’ awesome.
Sometimes, I just don’t understand this place.